| Citation ID |
01001A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100095 C01 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-09-27 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-10-24 |
| Current Penalty |
6000.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
8873.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-10-17 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.95(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent: a) Facility: On or about June 27, 2017: an employee working in the wood chipper area was exposed to continuous noise at a level of 196.8% (equivalent to an 8 hour TWA of 94.9 dBa) which is approximately 1.96 times the permissible exposure level of 100% (equivalent to an 8 hour TWA of 90 dBa) and the employer did not have a written hearing conservation program in place as described in 29 CFR 1910.95(c) through (o). b) Facility: On or about June 27, 2017: an employee in the log lathe area was exposed to continuous noise at a level of 86.9% (equivalent to an 8 hour TWA of 88.9 dBa) which is approximately 1.73 times the action level of 50% (equivalent to an 8 hour TWA of 85dBa) and the employer did not have a written hearing conservation program in place as described in 29 CFR 1910.95(c) through (o). |
|
| Citation ID |
01001B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100095 D01 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-09-27 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-10-24 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-10-17 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
28 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.95(d)(1): When information indicated that any employee's exposure equaled or exceed the 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels, the employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program: a) Facility: On or about June 27, 2017: an employee working in the wood chipper area was exposed to continuous noise at a levels exceeding the Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) of 90 dBa TWA and the employer had not developed a monitoring program to ensure employees were adequately protected from noise. b) Facility: On or about June 27, 2017: an employee working in the log lathe area was exposed to continuous noise at a levels exceeding the action level of 85 dBa TWA and the employer had not developed a monitoring program to ensure employees were adequately protected from noise. |
|
| Citation ID |
01001C |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100095 G01 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-09-27 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-10-24 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-10-17 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.95(g)(1): The employer did not establish and maintain an audiometric testing program as provided by 29 CFR 1910.95(g) by making audiometric testing available to all employees whose exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels: a) Facility: On or about June 27, 2017: employee(s) working in the facility were exposed to continuous noise at a level exceeding the Action Level of 85 dBa TWA and the employer did not establish an audiometric testing program to evaluate the employees hearing. |
|
| Citation ID |
01001D |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100095 K01 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-09-27 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-10-24 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-10-17 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.95(k)(1): The employer did not train each employee who is exposed to noise at or above an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.95(k): a) Facility: On or about June 27, 2017: an employee working in the wood chipper area was exposed to continuous noise at a level exceeding the permissible exposure limit of 90 dBa TWA and the employer did not train employees upon initial assignment and annually thereafter. a) Facility: On or about June 27, 2017: an employee working in the log lathe area was exposed to continuous noise at a level exceeding the Action Level of 85 dBa TWA and the employer did not train employees upon initial assignment and annually thereafter. |
|
| Citation ID |
01002 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100147 C04 I |
| Issuance Date |
2017-09-27 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-10-17 |
| Current Penalty |
4000.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
8873.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-10-17 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
28 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section: a) Log lathe: On or about June 26, 2017 the employer exposed his employees to potential hazardous energies in that employees were allowed to work on the Log Lathe which has multiple energy sources such as electric and hydraulic without having a written machine specific lock out procedure to ensure that those energy sources were controlled while the employees were performing maintenance or servicing on the machine. b) Wood chipper: On or about June 26, 2017 the employer exposed his employees to potential hazardous energies in that employees were allowed to work on the Chipper which has multiple energy sources such as electric and hydraulic without having a written machine specific lock out procedure to ensure that those energy sources were controlled while the employees were performing maintenance or servicing on the machine. |
|
| Citation ID |
01003 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100147 F03 II D |
| Issuance Date |
2017-09-27 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-10-17 |
| Current Penalty |
4000.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
8873.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-10-17 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
10 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.147(f)(3)(ii)(D): Each authorized employee did not affix a personal lockout or tagout device to the group lockout device before working on the machine or equipment: a) Log lathe: On or about June 26, 2017 the employer exposed his employees to potential hazardous energies in that employees were allowed to work on the Log Lathe where each employee did not affix a personal lockout or tagout device to the group lockout device before working on the machine or equipment b) Wood chipper:On or about June 26, 2017 the employer exposed his employees to potential hazardous energies in that employees were allowed to work on the Wood Chipper where each employee did not affix a personal lockout or tagout device to the group lockout device before working on the machine or equipment |
|
| Citation ID |
01004 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100219 C02 I |
| Issuance Date |
2017-09-27 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-10-17 |
| Current Penalty |
4000.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
6338.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-10-17 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
4 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.219(c)(2)(i): All exposed part(s) of horizontal shafting seven (7) feet or less from floor or working platform were not protected by stationary casing(s) enclosing shafting completely or by trough(s) enclosing sides and top or sides and bottom of shafting: a) Veneer peeling machine: On or about June 26, 2017 and at times prior thereto the employer exposed employees to caught-by hazards in that employees were required to work in close proximity to unguarded rotating shafts on the electric motor providing power to the veneer peeling machine. |
|
| Citation ID |
01005A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100219 C04 I |
| Issuance Date |
2017-09-27 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-10-17 |
| Current Penalty |
4000.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
5070.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-10-17 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
1 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.219(c)(4)(i): Unguarded projecting shaft end(s) did not present a smooth edge and end and projected more than one half the diameter of the shaft: a) Drying oven exit - exit of oven: On or about June 26, 2017 the employer exposed employees to caught-by hazards in that a 2.5 inches diameter solid shaft projected 2.5 inch and was unguarded. |
|
| Citation ID |
01005B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100219 C04 II |
| Issuance Date |
2017-09-27 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-10-17 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-10-17 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.219(c)(4)(ii): The unused keyway(s) of projecting shaft end(s) were not filled up or covered: a) Wood Chipper; On or about June 26, 2017 the employer exposed employees to amputation hazards in that employees were allowed to walk and work around the wood chipper that had an unguarded projecting shaft end with keyways. |
|
| Citation ID |
01006A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100219 D01 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-09-27 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-10-17 |
| Current Penalty |
4000.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
6338.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-10-17 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.219(d)(1): Pulley(s) with part(s) seven feet or less from the floor or work platform were not guarded in accordance with the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o): a) Wood Chipper; On or about June 26, 2017 the employer exposed employees to amputation hazards in that employees were allowed to walk and work around pulleys powering part of the wood chipper that had unguarded pulleys. |
|
| Citation ID |
01006B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100219 E01 I |
| Issuance Date |
2017-09-27 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-10-17 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-10-17 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
2 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.219(e)(1)(i): Horizontal belts which had both runs seven feet or less from the floor level were not guarded with a guard that extended to at least fifteen inches above the belt: a) Wood Chipper; On or about June 26, 2017 the employer exposed employees to amputation hazards in that employees were allowed to walk and work around a wood chipper that had an unguarded belt. |
|
| Citation ID |
01007 |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19100219 F03 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-09-27 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-10-17 |
| Current Penalty |
4000.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
6338.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-10-17 |
| Nr Instances |
2 |
| Nr Exposed |
3 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.219(f)(3): Sprocket wheels and chains which were seven -7 feet or less above floors or platforms were not enclosed: a) Wood Chipper; On or about June 26, 2017, the employer exposed employees to amputation hazards in that employees were allowed to walk and work within two feet of unguarded rotating exposed chains and sprockets that were within 5 feet of the floor. b) Drying Oven (Big Coe); On or about June 26, 2017, the employer exposed employees to amputation hazards in that employees were allowed to walk and work within two feet of unguarded rotating exposed chains and sprockets that were within 3 feet of the floor. |
|
| Citation ID |
01008A |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19101200 E01 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-09-27 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-10-24 |
| Current Penalty |
4000.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
6338.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-10-17 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
28 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: a) Facility: On or about June 26, 2017: Employer did not have a written hazard communication program detailing the hazards of chemicals such as but not limited to Diesel fuel, Sulfuric Acid, and hydraulic fluid used in the facility |
|
| Citation ID |
01008B |
| Citaton Type |
Serious |
| Standard Cited |
19101200 H01 |
| Issuance Date |
2017-09-27 |
| Abatement Due Date |
2017-10-24 |
| Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Initial Penalty |
0.0 |
| Final Order |
2017-10-17 |
| Nr Instances |
1 |
| Nr Exposed |
28 |
| Gravity |
5 |
| FTA Current Penalty |
0.0 |
| Citation text line |
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: a) Facility: On or about June 26, 2017 the employer exposed employees to hazardous chemicals and substances that include but are not limited to Diesel fuel, Sulfuric Acid, and hydraulic fluid without providing information and training on these chemicals and substances as required by the standard. In addition employees have not been trained on the global harmonized revisions the hazard communication standard. |
|
